Skip to main content

The Bakolori Dam in northwest Nigeria

Dams are barriers that can stop or restrict the flow of water. This is a particularly useful way for areas facing a period of low rainfall to store water and then release from the reservoir when needed (Perry, 2001). 

The Bakolori Dam is a 5.5 km long dam on the River Sokoto of northwest Nigeria. Originally, the dam aimed to control the excessive flooding that would take place in the Lower Rima flood plain below Sokoto. A small irrigation scheme at Bakolori of 12,000 ha was a secondary interest though the dam soon stored enough water to irrigate 30,000 ha of land, as part of the Bakolori Agricultural Project (Adams, 1985).

The dam was particularly significant for the Sokoto state as the drylands would remain dry for nine months, and the river was in spate for a short, rainy season. It would make sense for a dam to capture this water so it could be used efficiently throughout the long dry season, for irrigation (Adams, 2021).  

The case of the Bakolori Dam, however, exposes the depressing consequences of dam-building. One of its aims was to provide water for irrigation, yet it turns out that the dam had an adverse effect on food security. Reduced flooding meant that that there was a decline in crops downstream. 


Figure 1: Table showing the crop losses downstream of the Bakolori Dam (Adams, 1985) 

Figure 1 shows that there was a significant reduction in the extent of dry season cultivation, and a shift from high value crops to lower value crops such as millet and sorghum. Furthermore, village surveys suggested that there was a substantial decline in fish captured in both the wet and dry seasons. Five villages reported that after the dam was built, no fish was caught at all, and all villages reported reduced catches. This clearly illustrates that the dam was counterproductive for the downstream area. 

Also, communities were significantly impacted. Those whose homes and land were flooded upstream by the reservoir, were displaced to resettlement villages. The communities in the irrigation area itself had their land bulldozed as irrigation canals were put in but had to wait until the dam and supply canal were finished before getting it back or receiving water and starting to farm again. An undocumented number of protestors were unfortunately killed (Adams, 2021). 

Dams in theory are a tangible way to capture water for periods when supply is low. The problem, however, is that dams epitomise ‘development from above’.  They tend to be designed for national needs and fail to consider the needs of the floodplain people. It appears dams are built as if the riverine people do not matter as they are not wealthy or powerful; often they are not literate, their villages are often remote, and they can often be fed false promises. This is a pessimistic view, though from many cases of dams, it tends to be the reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Virtual Water Capable of Becoming Policy?

Previous blog posts have focused on more tangible methods to tackle the water and food scarcity issue, such as desalination, drip irrigation and extracting groundwater. But what if we did not have to employ these more tangible methods, and still work towards achieving food security?  Virtual water is a term coined by Allan (1997) ; it is used to address the water that is used in the production of any commodity. When this commodity is traded, water is also traded as water is embedded in the commodity (Zeitoun et al, 2010) . This applies to agricultural commodities, as the water used in the production of food staples is significant. For instance, 1,000 cubic metres of water is required to produce a ton of grain (Allan, 2003). Therefore, if it is food that is traded, virtual water can globalise the problem of water scarcity and allow countries that are facing this issue to import water intensive crops. The bluewater used for irrigated agriculture is a net drain on water resources and can

Towards Integrated River Basin and Water Management?

As mentioned by the previous blog post, the Bakolori Dam failed to take into consideration the needs of multiple different users of the basin, whether that be the upstream, downstream or irrigation zone users. Integrated river basin and water management (IRBWM), however, seeks to manage water resources in a comprehensive and holistic way, by considering it from several different dimensions. The aims of the IRBWM are really reflected in each of the terms used. It aims to integrate all water resource demands, manage this across time and space using data across the whole basin and considering how changes to the upstream may have an impact downstream (Savenije & Van der Zaag, 2008) .  Admittedly, this does seem to be a very ambitious task, but it is something that should be committed towards resolving difficulties (Van der Zaag, 2005) , as seen in the case of the Bakolori Dam. Africa’s implementation of the IRBWM, however, has been comparatively lower than the global average.  Figure 1

The Potential of Using Groundwater

The potential of groundwater Groundwater has received much recent attention due its potential to meet the increasing demand for water, particularly for those who do not have surface waters nearby. Whilst Asia has a long tradition of groundwater use for agriculture (30% of rural households in China and 50% in India may be using groundwater for crop production) (Giordano, 2006) , could Africa also divert towards this? Comparatively, only 1.5% of rural households in Africa use groundwater for crop production, so evidently figures show that Africa has missed this ‘groundwater revolution’.  Groundwater is of drinkable quality, thus does not need excessive or expensive treatment, and when in demand allows scaled development with infrastructure that is of lower cost compared to surface water infrastructure (Taylor et al, 2009) . Groundwater is a way to take advantage of the changes induced by climate change, such as the increased variability of surface water resources and soil moisture. Evide